Community EOL stopped your CVE patches
When upstream projects reach end-of-life, security patches stop. Your audit deadline doesn't care — and neither does the vulnerability you just found in production.
OSSWe make Open Source Enterprise Grade
Patch it. Architect it.Run it.
One vendor for the OSS stack you actually run. Community support ended. Your audit deadline didn't. OSSeva ships CVE patches, designs the architecture, and operates your runtimes under SLAs that satisfy auditors.
Signed builds15-min P1 SLASingle contract: software + services + ops
One of two commercial entities — alongside Broadcom — offering CVE remediation for community RabbitMQ versions.
$ osseva status --runtime all --format live
RabbitMQ3.11 – 4.xCovered
Spring Boot2.7.x / 3.xCovered
PostgreSQL12.x – 15.xCovered
Kafka2.8 – 3.7Covered
Node14 – 20 LTSCovered
Redis6.x / 7.xCoveredCVEs remediated · CVSS ≥ 7.0487
Next patch windowQ4 2026
P1 SLA · OSSeva Operate≤ 15 min
Coverage matrix · Updated per quarter · Signed artifacts
Trusted globally by enterprises
487CVEs tracked & patcheddirectory maintained
≤ 15mP1 incident responsecontractual SLA
10+Years on RabbitMQ & Springbefore it was mainstream
34Supported OSS runtimesKafka · Postgres · Spring +
The problem
Going all-in on open source is the easy part.
Commercial vendor pricing keeps climbing
Per-core licensing from Broadcom Tanzu. Throughput-based tiers from Confluent. The commercial tax on OSS keeps growing while the runtime stays the same.
No single vendor covers your full OSS stack
You have five contracts for five runtime layers. None talk to each other. Every audit is a scavenger hunt across vendors with different evidence formats.
The OSSeva model
Four pillars. One contract.
01 / Patch
CVE Patches That Never Stop
Drop-in signed builds for the OSS versions you actually run — even after the community stops. Artifact signing, remediation reports, and a public CVE directory your auditor can cite.
02 / Architect
Architecture Done by People Who Built It
Reference architectures, configuration audits, and migration design from engineers who ran these systems at Fortune-scale before it was a service category.
03 / Operate
24/7 Managed Operations
Full MSP: 24/7 monitoring, proactive incident management, SLAs as low as 15-minute P1 response. The operational rigor of a commercial vendor, without the runtime lock-in.
04 / Comply
Audit-Ready Out of the Box
SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI, ISO 27001, FedRAMP-aligned attestations. Remediation reports designed to be handed to your auditor on the first pass.
Check the work
We publish the evidence, not just the claim.
Erlang/OTP 24 has accumulated 22 CVE records since it reached end of life. RabbitMQ itself has none over the same period. That gap is the reason this company exists, and we show the working.
EOL Exposure Study 2026Read the study
Runtime coverage
Not a catalog. A depth play.
We cover a focused set of technologies at the internals level — the ones that run enterprise messaging, streaming, and data workloads.
RabbitMQ
3.11 – 4.xApache Kafka
2.8 – 3.7
ActiveMQ Artemis
2.xApache ActiveMQ Classic
Messaging & Streaming
Apache Pulsar
2.10 – 3.x
Erlang/OTP
Messaging & Streaming
Apache Camel
Messaging & Streaming
Spring Framework
5.2 – 6.1Spring Boot
2.7 – 3.x
Spring Security
5.x – 6.x
Apache Tomcat
Frameworks & RuntimesNode.js
Frameworks & Runtimes
.NET
Frameworks & RuntimesPostgreSQL
11 – 16
MySQL
Databases & Caching
MariaDB
Databases & CachingRedis
Databases & Caching
MongoDB
Databases & Caching
GemFire / Geode
9.x – 10.x
Hazelcast
Databases & Caching
Apache Ignite
Databases & Caching
Elasticsearch
Search & Analytics
Apache Solr
Search & Analytics
ClickHouse
Search & Analytics
Apache Druid
Search & Analytics
Apache Hadoop
Big Data & Dataflow
Apache HBase
Big Data & Dataflow
Apache Hive
Big Data & Dataflow
Apache Flink
Big Data & Dataflow
Apache Storm
Big Data & Dataflow
Apache NiFi
Big Data & Dataflow
Apache ZooKeeper
Coordination & Consensus
etcd
Coordination & Consensus
HashiCorp Consul
Coordination & ConsensusPatchedArchitectedOperatedCompliant
View full technology catalog31 Oct2026HashiCorp Consul 1.22 end of life: 31 October 2026Consul 1.22 reaches end of support on 31 October 2026, according to HashiCorp's Consul Enterprise support page.in 5 days10 Nov2026.NET 8 end of life: 10 November 2026.NET 8 end of life is 10 November 2026: that is the last day Microsoft can ship a .NET 8 or .NET 9 security update, and its support policy lists no paid extension.in 15 days10 Nov2026.NET 9 end of life: 10 November 2026.NET 9 end of life is 10 November 2026, the same day as .NET 8.in 15 days12 Nov2026PostgreSQL 14 end of life: 12 November 2026PostgreSQL 14 reaches end of life on 12 November 2026.in 17 days31 Dec2026Spring Boot 4.0 end of life: 31 December 2026Spring Boot 4.0 reaches the end of open source support on 31 December 2026, and spring.io lists commercial support until 31 December 2027.in 66 days31 Dec2026Spring Security 7.0 end of life: 31 December 2026Spring Security 7.0 reaches the end of open source support on 31 December 2026, the same day as Spring Boot 4.0, which manages it.in 66 days31 Jan2027RabbitMQ 4.3 end of life: 31 January 2027RabbitMQ 4.3 leaves community support on 31 January 2027, about nine months after 4.3.0 shipped on 23 April 2026.in 97 days28 Feb2027Apache Camel 4.18 LTS end of life: February 2027Apache Camel 4.18 LTS reaches end of life in February 2027, per Camel's download page.in 125 days
Use cases
How teams run unsupported open source safely
Real patterns from regulated estates: CVE patching past end of life, audit evidence, vendor exits and version migrations, one runtime at a time.
Enterprise RabbitMQ CVE Patching & Compliance
RabbitMQ
A security team needs CVE fixes backported onto RabbitMQ 3.12 or 3.13 without a forced broker upgrade, plus patch evidence an auditor will accept without a follow-up question.
Read the use case: Enterprise RabbitMQ CVE Patching & ComplianceKafka CVE Patching & Compliance
Apache Kafka
A regulated Kafka deployment needs CVE remediation and a patch trail its auditor will accept, without buying a full commercial platform to get them.
Read the use case: Kafka CVE Patching & ComplianceSpring CVE Patching for Retail Banking
Spring Framework / Spring Boot
Spring applications behind consumer banking need a CVE fix landed on the version already through change control -- not a framework major-version rewrite mid-cycle.
Read the use case: Spring CVE Patching for Retail BankingErlang/OTP CVE Exposure Under a Patched Broker
Erlang/OTP
RabbitMQ has taken no CVEs since its end-of-life date. Erlang/OTP 24, the runtime underneath it, has taken 22 -- one of them at CVSS 10.0. Patching the broker does not patch the runtime.
Read the use case: Erlang/OTP CVE Exposure Under a Patched Broker
Apache ZooKeeper Extended Support Past EOL
Apache ZooKeeper
ZooKeeper sits under Kafka, HBase, Solr and NiFi as the coordination layer. It is rarely anyone's named responsibility, and its 3.5, 3.6 and 3.7 lines are all past community end of life.
Read the use case: Apache ZooKeeper Extended Support Past EOL
Hazelcast IMDG Extended Support & Migration
Hazelcast
Hazelcast IMDG 3.x to Platform 5 has no rolling upgrade path. For a cluster holding live session or cache state, that makes the upgrade an availability problem, not just a version problem.
Read the use case: Hazelcast IMDG Extended Support & MigrationPostgreSQL Extended Support Past Community EOL
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL supports each major version for five years, so one major line reaches end of life every November. Moving a production database to a new major version takes rehearsal and a change window, and estates with many clusters rarely finish before the date.
Read the use case: PostgreSQL Extended Support Past Community EOLApache Tomcat Extended Support & Jakarta Migration
Apache Tomcat
Tomcat 8.5 is past end of life and Tomcat 9 follows. Tomcat 10 moved to the Jakarta namespace, so the upgrade changes every servlet import in the deployed application, not just the container.
Read the use case: Apache Tomcat Extended Support & Jakarta Migration.NET Applications Past Microsoft's Three-Year LTS Window
.NET
.NET LTS releases carry three years of support. For an application estate on a slower modernization cycle, that clock runs out before the migration budget arrives.
Read the use case: .NET Applications Past Microsoft's Three-Year LTS WindowNode.js Extended Support Past Community EOL
Node.js
Node.js 18 is past community end of life. Moving a production service to a newer major means revalidating a dependency tree that was locked against the old one.
Read the use case: Node.js Extended Support Past Community EOL
Why OSSeva
Not a binary vendor. A runtime partner.
| Capability |  | EOL-binary specialists | Broad-line OSS support |
|---|---|---|---|
| CVE patches for community-EOL versions | Partial | ||
| Reference architectures per runtime | Limited | ||
| 24/7 managed operations (MSP) | Some | ||
| 15-minute P1 incident response SLA | Tier-dep | ||
| Audit-ready compliance documentation | |||
| Migration design from Tanzu / Confluent | Limited | ||
| Single contract: software + services + ops |
“We were facing a Broadcom Tanzu renewal at 4× the previous cost, or a migration we didn't have the runway to execute. OSSeva gave us a third option: keep running what we have, fully supported, while we plan the migration on our own timeline.”
Platform Engineering LeadGlobal Financial Services Firm
What is OSSeva?
OSSeva is an enterprise extended lifecycle support provider for open-source software. We deliver CVE-patched builds, compliance documentation, and managed operations for technologies that have reached community end-of-life — including RabbitMQ, Apache Kafka, PostgreSQL, Spring Framework, Redis, Node.js, .NET, Apache Tomcat, and GemFire — under a single contract.
What happens when an open-source project reaches community end-of-life (EOL)?
When a project reaches community EOL, upstream maintainers stop releasing security patches, bug fixes, and vulnerability disclosures for that version. CVEs affecting the runtime go unpatched. For enterprise teams, this creates audit findings, compliance gaps under frameworks like PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, and DORA, and direct security exposure. OSSeva backports CVE fixes to EOL versions so teams can stay secure and compliant without a forced migration.
Which open-source technologies does OSSeva support?
OSSeva currently supports: RabbitMQ (3.11, 3.12, 3.13), Apache Kafka (2.8–3.5), PostgreSQL (11, 12, 13), Spring Framework 5.3.x, Spring Boot 2.7.x, Spring Security 5.8.x, Redis 6.2 and 7.0, Node.js 14 to 22, .NET 6 to 10, Apache Tomcat 8.5 and 9.0, ActiveMQ Artemis, Apache Pulsar, and VMware GemFire. Coverage expands as new technologies reach EOL.
How does OSSeva compare to HeroDevs or OpenLogic?
OSSeva differentiates on three dimensions. First, depth: our team includes some of the world's top RabbitMQ and distributed messaging experts, with over a decade of Fortune 500 deployment experience. Second, scope: OSSeva covers not just patch delivery but architectural assurance, compliance documentation, and managed operations under one contract. Third, focus: we cover the enterprise messaging and data stack specifically — not every open-source project under the sun.
Does OSSeva provide compliance documentation for audits?
Yes. Every OSSeva engagement includes compliance-ready documentation: CVE attestation letters, patch delivery records, evidence matrices mapped to SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria, PCI DSS Requirement 6.3, HIPAA §164.312, ISO 27001:2022 Annex A.8, EU DORA ICT risk requirements, and FedRAMP controls. Our compliance documentation is designed to satisfy enterprise audit teams and regulators directly.
How quickly does OSSeva deliver CVE patches after a disclosure?
OSSeva patches Critical vulnerabilities (CVSS ≥ 9.0) within 48 hours and High within 7 days. Everything else goes into a quarterly batch. All patches are accompanied by signed binaries, SHA-256 checksums, and attestation documentation.
Can OSSeva support our entire open-source stack under one contract?
Yes. Most OSSeva customers run multiple supported technologies simultaneously — for example, RabbitMQ plus Spring Framework plus PostgreSQL. OSSeva bundles all covered technologies into a single Master Services Agreement, with a unified compliance documentation package and a single point of contact for security and operational issues.
What is the difference between OSSeva Patch, Assure, and Operate?
OSSeva Patch covers CVE remediation and signed patch builds. OSSeva Assure adds 24/7 reactive support, compliance documentation, architectural review, and audit attestation on top of Patch. OSSeva Operate is the full managed offering — Assure plus proactive 24/7 monitoring and incident response, infrastructure monitoring, SRE-level operational support, and upgrade planning. Most regulated-industry customers start with Assure and add Operate for production-critical workloads.
Get a quote
Stop migrating.
Start operating.
Community support ended. Your audit deadline didn't. Let's close the gap.
Prefer to talk or read more first?